Hi,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:27:43AM +0530, Kiran Raparthy wrote:
> >>> Thank you very much for taking time in reviewing the patch.
> >>> I will try to improve the patch as per your suggestions.
> >>> however,i have few queries which i wanted to understand from you.
> >>
> >> sure thing.
> >>
> >>> On 7 October 2014 19:55, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> >> +static int otg_wakeupsource_init(void)
> >>> >> +{
> >>> >> + int ret_usb2;
> >>> >> + int ret_usb3;
> >>> >> + char wsource_name_usb2[40];
> >>> >> + char wsource_name_usb3[40];
> >>> >> + static struct usb_phy *otgws_xceiv_usb2;
> >>> >> + static struct usb_phy *otgws_xceiv_usb3;
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> + otgws_xceiv_usb2 = usb_get_phy(USB_PHY_TYPE_USB2);
> >>> >> + otgws_xceiv_usb3 = usb_get_phy(USB_PHY_TYPE_USB3);
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> + if (IS_ERR(otgws_xceiv_usb2) && IS_ERR(otgws_xceiv_usb3)) {
> >>> >> + pr_err("%s: No OTG transceiver found\n", __func__);
> >>> >> + return PTR_ERR(otgws_xceiv_usb2);
> >>> >> + }
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> + spin_lock_init(&otgws_xceiv_usb2->otgws_slock);
> >>> >> + spin_lock_init(&otgws_xceiv_usb3->otgws_slock);
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> + snprintf(wsource_name_usb2, sizeof(wsource_name_usb2),
> >>> >> "vbus-%s",
> >>> >> + dev_name(otgws_xceiv_usb2->dev));
> >>> >> + wakeup_source_init(&otgws_xceiv_usb2->wsource,
> >>> >> wsource_name_usb2);
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> + snprintf(wsource_name_usb3, sizeof(wsource_name_usb3),
> >>> >> "vbus-%s",
> >>> >> + dev_name(otgws_xceiv_usb3->dev));
> >>> >> + wakeup_source_init(&otgws_xceiv_usb3->wsource,
> >>> >> wsource_name_usb3);
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> + otgws_xceiv_usb2->otgws_nb.notifier_call =
> >>> >> otgws_otg_usb2_notifications;
> >>> >> + ret_usb2 = usb_register_notifier(otgws_xceiv_usb2,
> >>> >> + &otgws_xceiv_usb2->otgws_nb);
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> + otgws_xceiv_usb3->otgws_nb.notifier_call =
> >>> >> otgws_otg_usb3_notifications;
> >>> >> + ret_usb3 = usb_register_notifier(otgws_xceiv_usb3,
> >>> >> + &otgws_xceiv_usb3->otgws_nb);
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> + if (ret_usb2 && ret_usb3) {
> >>> >> + pr_err("%s: usb_register_notifier on transceiver
> >>> >> failed\n",
> >>> >> + __func__);
> >>> >> + wakeup_source_trash(&otgws_xceiv_usb2->wsource);
> >>> >> + wakeup_source_trash(&otgws_xceiv_usb3->wsource);
> >>> >> + otgws_xceiv_usb2 = NULL;
> >>> >> + otgws_xceiv_usb3 = NULL;
> >>> >> + return ret_usb2 | ret_usb3;
> >>> >> + }
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> + return 0;
> >>> >> +}
> >>> >> +
> >>> >> +late_initcall(otg_wakeupsource_init);
> >>> >
> >>> > you guys are really not getting what I mean. I asked for this to be
> >>> > built into the core itself. This means that you shouldn't need to use
> >>> > notifications nor should you need to call usb_get_phy(). You're part of
> >>> > the PHY framework.
> >>> >
> >>> > All this late_initcall() nonsense should go.
> >>> >
> >>> > This code won't even work if we have more than one phy of the same type
> >>> > (AM437x SoC, for example, has up to 4 instances of dwc3, so that's 4
> >>> > USB2 PHYs), because you can't grab the PHY you want.
> >>>
> >>> Apologies,I am new to usb sub system,so i missed this point before i
> >>> posted my patch,Thanks for the information.
> >>
> >> np.
> >>
> >>> > What you need is to:
> >>> >
> >>> > 1) make PHY notifiers generic (move all of that phy-core.c)
> >>> From the above points,you mentioned that "if we built it into core,we
> >>> shouldn't need to use notifications"
> >>> and your first point here says that make phy notifiers generic in
> >>> phy-core.c
> >>> can you help me understanding it better so that there wont be any
> >>> understanding gap.
> >>
> >> yeah, notifiers should go but if you really must use them, then at least
> >> make all of that generic ;-)
> >>
> >>> > 2) introduce usb_phy_set_event(phy, event) (which just sets the even to
> >>> > a
> >>> > phy->event member for now)
> >>> > 3) make all PHY drivers use usb_phy_set_event()
> >>> > 4) add the following to usb_phy_set_event()
> >>> >
> >>> > switch (event) {
> >>> > case USB_EVENT_ENUMERATED:
> >>> > pm_stay_awake(&otgws_xceiv->wsource);
> >>> > break;
> >>> >
> >>> > case USB_EVENT_NONE:
> >>> > case USB_EVENT_VBUS:
> >>> > case USB_EVENT_ID:
> >>> > case USB_EVENT_CHARGER:
> >>> > pm_wakeup_event(&otgws_xceiv->wsource,
> >>> > msecs_to_jiffies(TEMPORARY_HOLD_TIME));
> >>> > break;
> >>> >
> >>> > default:
> >>> > break;
> >>> > }
> >>> >
> >>> Once the phy drivers receives per-PHY event notification(if we use
> >>> notifier,else "for any event") we can call usb_phy_set_event from phy
> >>> driver to hold the wakeup source.
> >>> Please correct me if my understanding is incorrect.
> >>
> >> yeah. In fact, you can call usb_phy_set_event() directly from PHY's IRQ
> >> handler.
> >>
> >>> I have gone through some phy drivers in drivers/phy,since the each
> >>> driver implementation is different from others, i didn't get the best
> >>> place in PHY driver
> >>> where we can trigger(use phy-core functionality) per-PHY notifier
> >>> registration. any pointers here?
> >>
> >> registration ? probe(), they all have probe() functions. Now to figure
> >> out where to call usb_phy_set_event(). That's something completely
> >> different, and that's where the core of this change is :-)
> >>
> >> For PHYs which have IRQ lines, easy: just call usb_phy_set_event() from
> >> IRQ handler. For those who don't, then it's a little more difficult and
> >> will require your investigation.
> >
> just a gentle reminder, can you have a look at below points and share
> your thoughts?
Send the patch, I have reviewed this multiple times and all those
comments are archived on multiple mailing list archives. Just read them
again if you need.
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
