On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 09:37:14AM -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Thierry Reding >> <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 03:27:50PM -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote: >> > [...] >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nvidia,tegra124-xusb-padctl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nvidia,tegra124-xusb-padctl.txt >> > [...] >> >> +Optional properties: >> >> +------------------- >> >> +- vbus-{0,1,2}-supply: VBUS regulator for the corresponding UTMI pad. >> >> +- vddio-hsic-supply: VDDIO regulator for the HSIC pads. >> >> +- nvidia,usb3-port-{0,1}-lane: PCIe/SATA lane to which the corresponding USB3 >> >> + port is mapped. See <dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra-xusb.h> for the list >> >> + of valid values. >> > >> > I dislike how we now need to provide a list of all pins in the header >> > file, where previously we used strings for this. This could become very >> > ugly if the set of pins changes in future generations of this IP block. >> > >> > Could we instead derive this from the pinmux nodes? For example you have >> > this in the example below: >> > >> > usb3p0 { >> > nvidia,lanes = "pcie-0"; >> > ... >> > }; >> > >> > Perhaps what we need is to either key off the node name or add another >> > property, such as: >> > >> > nvidia,usb3-port = <0>; >> > >> > This would match the nvidia,usb2-port property that you've added below. >> >> That is actually how I described the USB3 port to SS lane mapping >> originally, but in review of an earlier version of this series, >> Stephen suggested that I make it a separate, not pinconfig property >> since it wasn't a value written directly to the hardware. I'm fine >> with changing it back as the pinconfig property makes more sense to me >> as well. > > Hmm... I had considered it a mux option of the specific lane. If the > function is usb3, it'd still need to be muxed to one of the ports. So > it's additional information associated with the usb3 function. > > I did look through the driver changes and can't really make out which > part of the code actually performs this assignment. Can you point me to > it? There's not really an assignment. The property is used to map between a lane (e.g. PCIe-0 or SATA) and the USB3.0 port it's mapped to. For an example of where it's used, take a look at usb3_phy_power_on(). There are certain per-lane registers which need to be programmed in addition to the per-USB3.0 port pad registers. This mapping is used to determine which lane needs to be programmed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html