Re: [PATCH usb 00/32] cleanup on resource check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:08:45AM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 09:05 AM, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> >Hi Balbi,
> >
> >On 10/30/2014 08:13 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 06:42:08AM +0530, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> >>>On Thursday 30 October 2014 02:43 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> >>>>On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Varka Bhadram wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>This series removes the duplication of sanity check for
> >>>>>platform_get_resource() return resource. It will be checked
> >>>>>with devm_ioremap_resource()
> >>>>>
> >>>>>This series based on usb/master.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Varka Bhadram (32):
> >>>>>   host: ehci-atmel: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-exynos: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-fsl: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   dwc3: core: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   dwc3: dwc3-keystone: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   renesas_usbhs: common: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   phy: phy-rcar-usb: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   musb: musb_dsps: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   musb: musb_core: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: xhci-plat: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: uhci-platform: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ohci-st: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ohci-spear: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-sh: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ohci-pxa27x: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ohci-platform: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ohci-octeon: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ohci-jz4740: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ohci-exynos: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ohci-da8xx: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ohci-at91: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-w90x900: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-tegra: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-st: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-spear: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-sead3: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-platform: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-orion: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-octeon: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-mxc: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-mv: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>>   host: ehci-msm: remove duplicate check on resource
> >>>>For all the ehci, ohci, and uhci changes:
> >>>>
> >>>>Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>Thanx for your ACK.
> >>>
> >>>>I didn't look carefully at the others, but the dwc3-core patch (4/32)
> >>>>definitely seemed wrong.
> >>>>
> >>>I don't find any wrong in the code.
> >>Really ? Look more carefuly
> >>
> >>>static int dwc3_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>{
> >>>    struct device        *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >>>    struct dwc3_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> >>>    struct device_node    *node = dev->of_node;
> >>>    struct resource        *res;
> >>>    struct dwc3        *dwc;
> >>>
> >>>    int            ret;
> >>>
> >>>    void __iomem        *regs;
> >>>    void            *mem;
> >>>
> >>>    mem = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dwc) + DWC3_ALIGN_MASK,
> >>>GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>    if (!mem)
> >>>        return -ENOMEM;
> >>>
> >>>    dwc = PTR_ALIGN(mem, DWC3_ALIGN_MASK + 1);
> >>>    dwc->mem = mem;
> >>>    dwc->dev = dev;
> >>>
> >>>    res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> >>>    if (!res) {
> >>>        dev_err(dev, "missing IRQ\n");
> >>>        return -ENODEV;
> >>>    }
> >>>    dwc->xhci_resources[1].start = res->start;
> >>>    dwc->xhci_resources[1].end = res->end;
> >>>    dwc->xhci_resources[1].flags = res->flags;
> >>>    dwc->xhci_resources[1].name = res->name;
> >>>
> >>>    res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >>>    /*
> >>>     * Request memory region but exclude xHCI regs,
> >>>     * since it will be requested by the xhci-plat driver.
> >>>     */
> >>>    regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> >>because you moved this call here...
> >>
> >>>    if (IS_ERR(regs))
> >>>        return PTR_ERR(regs);
> >>>
> >>>    dwc->xhci_resources[0].start = res->start;
> >>>    dwc->xhci_resources[0].end = dwc->xhci_resources[0].start +
> >>>                    DWC3_XHCI_REGS_END;
> >>>    dwc->xhci_resources[0].flags = res->flags;
> >>>    dwc->xhci_resources[0].name = res->name;
> >>>
> >>>    res->start += DWC3_GLOBALS_REGS_START;
> >>... before doing this, you're now ioremapping the entire space
> >>*INCLUDING* the XHCI address space, which means that you have just
> >>broken every single platform using this driver in host mode.
> >>
> >In that case, i will drop this patch.
> >
> >Is other patches are fine except #04/32 patch..?
> >
> Can i add you Ack..? And based on which tree i need to generate the patches.?
> 
> I rebased all these patches on [1] of master branch.
> 
> [1]: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git

"patches that go through my tree" means that I will apply them to my
tree and send a pull request to Greg. Have a look at MAINTAINERS.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux