Hi, On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:46:37PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:41:01PM +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:26:56AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > alright, it's pretty deterministic however. Always on the same test, no > > > matter which USB controller, no matter if backing store is RAM or MMC. > > > > > > Those two undefined instructions on the disassembly caught my attention, > > > perhaps I'm facing a GCC bug ? > > > > The undefined instructions are just ARM's BUG() implementation. > > > > But did you see the question I asked you yesterday in your other thread? > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg368634.html > > hmm, completely missed that, sorry. I'm using 4.8.2, will try something > else. seems to be working fine now, thanks. I'll leave test running overnight just in case. thanks again, and sorry for the noise. PS: I wonder if we should a warning message to the build system if we're building with known broken versions of GCC. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
