> The new patch clears the halt condition. I mean usb_clear_halt( ) returned zero. Thanks, Naveen On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Naveen Kumar Parna <pnaveenkos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the new patch. > > > > The new patch clears the halt condition. But after submitting the urb > again the INT in endpoint returns EPIPE, this behavior continues > infinitely. > > > > Corresponding kernel log is here: > > Oct 7 17:58:41 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 16.311863] hci0 urb > ffff88012f670b40 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 17:58:41 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 16.311988] hci5 urb > ffff8801379d2180 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 17:58:41 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 16.455464] hci4 urb > ffff88012a4b2e40 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 17:58:41 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 16.455586] hci1 urb > ffff88012a4b2180 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 17:58:41 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 16.455691] hci2 urb > ffff88012f670480 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 17:58:41 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 16.455784] hci3 urb > ffff88012f670e40 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 17:58:41 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 16.455853] hci0 urb > ffff880131e5ee40 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 17:58:41 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 16.455913] hci5 urb > ffff880131e5e780 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 17:58:44 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 19.690366] hci4 urb > ffff880131e5e780 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 17:58:44 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 19.690490] hci5 urb > ffff880131e5e300 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 17:58:47 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 22.163163] hci5 urb > ffff88012f541540 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 18:06:01 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 45.313996] hci1 urb > ffff880131e5ee40 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 18:06:01 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 45.314121] hci0 urb > ffff880131e5e900 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 18:06:01 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 45.314169] hci3 urb > ffff880131e5e3c0 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 18:06:01 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 45.314213] hci2 urb > ffff880131e5ef00 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 18:06:01 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 45.314245] hci4 urb > ffff88012f541d80 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 18:06:01 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 45.314274] hci5 urb > ffff88012f541540 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 18:06:01 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 45.319974] hci2 urb > ffff8801384dcb40 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 18:06:01 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 45.320095] hci0 urb > ffff8801384dc300 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 18:06:01 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 45.320151] hci4 urb > ffff8801384dc6c0 status -32 count 0 > > Oct 7 18:06:01 naveen-OptiPlex-745 kernel: [ 45.320193] hci5 urb > ffff8801384dcf00 status -32 count 0 > > > > Thanks, > > Naveen > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 12:14 +0530, Naveen Kumar Parna wrote: >>> > + err = usb_clear_halt(data->udev, >>> > + usb_rcvbulkpipe(data->udev, >>> > + data->intr_ep->bEndpointAddress)); >>> >>> EPIPE occurred for INT in endpoint, so we should use usb_rcvintpipe() >>> instead of usb_rcvbulkpipe() right? >> >> Yes. And I noticed a copy and past error. >> >>> Does the “lsusb –v” gives any clue about the reason for getting -EPIPE? >> >> No. Could you nevertheless test the attached version? >> >> Regards >> Oliver >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
