On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 03:43:07PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:24:46PM +0300, Octavian Purdila wrote:
>
>> > Either way, it looks like this could race with get_direction() if you
>> > get a set_direction() while get_direction() is retrieving the direction
>> > from the device.
>> >
>> > This would break gpio_get().
>> >
>> I don't think gpio_set_direction() and gpio_get() are allowed to race.
>
> I wrote that set_direction() and get_direction() could race, which in
> turn would break gpio_get() as you would be caching the wrong
> direction setting.
>
OK, I now see the problem. I think doing this in get_direction() will
fix the issue:
if (!test_and_set_bit(offset, dln2->pin_dir_set))
set/clear_bit(offset, dln2->pin_dir);
because gpiolib calls get_direction() while requesting a pin and
request cannot race with itself. Which means that get_direction() can
not race with itself the first time it is called, when the set/clear
operation will be run.
And because we know that get_direction() is called first, we can even
remove the set/clear operation from set_direction().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
