On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 07:57:12AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:08:02AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Peter Chen wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:12:42AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Peter Chen wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 09:48:15PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Peter Chen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Greg & Alan, any comments for this patchset? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In patch 2/6, why did you move the !is_targeted(udev) code from > > > > > > > > > usb_enumerate_device_otg() to usb_enumerate_device()? Why not leave > > > > > > > > > the code where it is? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TPL support is also needed for embedded host, not only otg host. > > > > > > > > > > > > But usb_enumerate_device_otg() gets called for all types of > > > > > > host, right? At least, it gets called whenever usb_enumerate_device() > > > > > > runs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it contains "#ifdef CONFIG_USB_OTG". But your patch has "if (... > > > > > > && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_OTG))", so the behavior is the same. Why > > > > > > move the code if there's no change in behavior? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At former code, the tpl support judgement (in function is_targeted) will > > > > > only be called if CONFIG_USB_OTG is defined, but now, we need tpl support > > > > > for all targeted hosts. > > > > > > > > > > Why we need IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_OTG) as last conditions at if conditions, > > > > > the reason is the operation which the B-device may want switch to host even > > > > > if it is not at A's TPL is only for OTG host. > > > > > > > > The only side effect in is_targeted() is the dev_err() message. Are > > > > you saying that this dev_err() message needs to appear even when > > > > CONFIG_USB_OTG is disabled? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, both embedded host and otg host CAN support TPL, if the embedded host > > > SHOULD support TPL, it should show an err message if the unsupported device is > > > on the port. > > > > > > At OTG & EH compliance test plan, > > > (http://www.usb.org/developers/onthego/otgeh_compliance_plan_1_2.pdf) > > > page 124, the chapter 7.3.6 A-UUT Unsupported device Message test, it needs host > > > prints "Unsupported Device" if the attaching device is not supported > > > (without at Targeted Peripheral List). > > > > Okay, then I have no objections to this patch series. > > > > Alan Stern > > Hi Greg, > > Will you queue this patchset? Ok, will do, give me a day or so, thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
