On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 03:29:47PM +0200, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > > If not and since I'm told black lists and the like won't > > work, my advice for the record is to use FreeBSD or Windows > > for tools that need this capability. > > I doubt either of them forces users to hack up flags for these cases. Why was this change needed in the first place? There's no explanation in the patch itself. > At least for windows I suspect it just never sends the LUN encoded > in the CDB and treats USB devices special instead of our insistance > on pretending they are SCSI-2. We no longer pretend that USB mass-storage devices have any particular SCSI level. See commit 09b6b51b0b6c. > Maybe some of the USB people have on the wire traces or access to > device or windows documentation on this? Most likely it varies with the version of Windows and the INQUIRY data returned by the device. I can obtain hardware traces for the kinds of devices and computers lying around here. But what sort of combinations should I test? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
