On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 12:58 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 07/30/2014 12:00 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > looking at this code made me think whether there actually is a limit > > on the host. It seems to me that we should not have more concurrent > > commands than the host controller supports streams. > > What do you think? > > AFAIK this is already enforced by the scsi_activate_tcq(sdev, devinfo->qdepth - 2); > call in uas_slave_configure(). I assume the host can_queue setting is relevant > for hosts which can have more then one slave, but for us not so much. I can see no reason why a UAS device shouldn't have multiple slaves. A disk enclosure would be the obvious example. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
