On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 07:46:46AM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did some more review, sorry ;)
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:46:24AM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> > +static struct gpio_chip template_chip = {
> > + .label = "pl2303-gpio",
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .direction_input = pl2303_gpio_direction_in,
> > + .get = pl2303_gpio_get,
> > + .direction_output = pl2303_gpio_direction_out,
> > + .set = pl2303_gpio_set,
> > + .can_sleep = 1,
> > +};
>
> Could this be made static const? (since it's for one-time copy purposes only)
>
>
OK, I will add const.
> > +struct pl2303_gpio {
> > + /*
> > + * 0..3: unknown (zero)
> > + * 4: gp0 output enable (1: gp0 pin is output, 0: gp0 pin is input)
> > + * 5: gp1 output enable (1: gp1 pin is output, 0: gp1 pin is input)
> > + * 6: gp0 pin value
> > + * 7: gp1 pin value
> > + */
> > + u8 index;
>
> Most frequently accessed member at first position - good.
>
>
> > +static inline struct pl2303_gpio *to_pl2303_gpio(struct gpio_chip
> > *chip)
> > +{
> > + return container_of(chip, struct pl2303_gpio, gpio_chip);
> > +}
>
> Nicely cast-avoiding helper :)
>
>
> > + spriv->gpio->index = 0x00;
> > + spriv->gpio->serial = serial;
> > + spriv->gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
> > + spriv->gpio->gpio_chip.ngpio = GPIO_NUM;
> > + spriv->gpio->gpio_chip.base = -1;
> > + spriv->gpio->gpio_chip.dev = &serial->interface->dev;
> > + /* initialize GPIOs, input mode as default */
> > + pl2303_vendor_write(spriv->gpio->serial, 1, spriv->gpio->index);
>
> Perhaps the index line should better be moved
> right before the pl2303_vendor_write() line,
> to more obviously hint at why it's "input mode"
> (but OTOH currently you're cleanly initializing things in correct member order,
> so it's probably better to keep it that way).
>
> Also, it's perhaps a better idea to do this initial init call
> via calls of actual GPIO API rather than implementation-specific call
> (e.g. that way one could simple reuse the generic GPIO call for devices
> which happen to implement GPIO via a different mechanism...).
> (hmm, nope, from a layering POV it's not recommendable,
> since we clearly are at hardware-specific init here,
> where you want to firmly guarantee
> that the hardware is directly and fully initialized).
>
>
Thanks very much for review :)
> Since there are several repeated
> pl2303_vendor_write(...serial, 1, ...index) calls,
> it's possibly a good idea to wrap these calls in a convenience
> pl2303_gpio_state_update(gpio)
> This would also increase GPIO hardware abstraction,
> by then simply having to provide an alternative for this single function
> if needed.
> Also, it may (depending on the number of callers,
> which is on the low side here unfortunately)
> reduce instruction cache footprint.
The reason I don't want to add more abstraction here are:
1: Abstraction don't reduce code lines, then reuse
pl2303_vendor_write|read is a better choice, i think.
2: pl2303_vendor_write|read is more generic than abstraction,
then someone maybe could use pl2303_vendor_write|read to support
another two Auxiliary GPIOs on PL2303HXD(I don't have one) directly
without play with abstraction.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
