Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 07:05:32PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Remove mach specific includes and use platform_data includes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c >> index fed8b2e..04aced8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/pxa27x_udc.c >> @@ -28,12 +28,11 @@ >> #include <linux/of_gpio.h> >> >> #include <asm/byteorder.h> >> -#include <mach/hardware.h> >> >> #include <linux/usb.h> >> #include <linux/usb/ch9.h> >> #include <linux/usb/gadget.h> >> -#include <mach/udc.h> >> +#include <linux/platform_data/pxa2xx_udc.h> > > this patch is fixing includes which were added in patch 1. Ah yes, you're correct. The includes breakage began at patch 1, I probably have it from a missed rebase in my tree ... Unfortunately for me it means a v5, with the includes fixed in patch 1 (the asm/byteorder.h looks very ugly and unwise too), and patch 4 discarded (actually merged into patch 1 fixes). Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
