Hi, On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:19:08PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > Glad to see you find some time for this patch set :) yeah, have been quite busy lately. > On 06/30/2014 07:19 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 02:52:34PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > >> When a 0-length packet is received on the bus, desc->pd0 yields 1, > >> which confuses the driver's users. This information is clearly wrong > >> and not in accordance to the datasheet, but it's been observed on an > >> AM335x board, very reproducible. > >> > >> Fix this by looking at bit 19 in PD2 of the completed packet. This bit > >> will tell us if a zero-length packet was received on a queue. If it's > >> set, ignore the value in PD0 and report a total length of 0 instead. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Does this create dependency on the following patches ? Since they're in > > the same series, I suppose it does... Please clarify so we don't cause > > regressions upstream due to ordering. > > No, there's no dependency. I sent them in one series as they all > contribute to the fact that multiple USB devices would behave > incorrectly on musb. All of these patches have to be applied to fix > different details, but for this particular one, the order doesn't matter. awesome, thanks > I also asked Vinod to pick this single patch for his tree, but there was > no answer yet. cool. hopefully we can get a better v3.17. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
