On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Dan Williams wrote: > Alan, I'm wondering if we should be looking at a change in the core to > prevent these rpm_suspend() vs dpm_suspend() collisions? I.e. waking > up runtime suspended hubs prior to khubd being frozen? I don't fully understand the question. What collisions specifically are you referring to? And why do you want to wake up runtime-suspended hubs right at the start of a system suspend? Sure, if the hub's wakeup setting needs to be changed then the hub has to be runtime-resumed first. But why do this before freezing khubd? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
