On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 11:11 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Toralf Förster wrote: > > > > > On 06/19/2013 09:03 PM, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > Sarah: > > > > correctly and one didn't. Regardless, it was surprising to see > > > > Toralf's report that an Intel hub doesn't work right. I don't have any > > > > machines with a comparable chipset, so I can't test one of those > > > > integrated hubs directly. > > > > > > > > Can somebody at Intel look into this? > > > > > > > > Alan Stern > > > > > > > > > > > Just tried kernel 3.15. - issue does still exists > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59011 > > > > Not surprising, since it is a bug in the hardware. > > Alan, > > I don't like this, but it might be enough to simply > revert 0aa2832dd0d9d8609fd8f15139bc7572541a1215. > I am afraid we have to deal with real hardware, not specs. And I'm afraid you're right. It's a shame, because part of the reason I wrote that patch (although it wasn't mentioned in the description) was to prevent a class of bugs involving races between suspend and resume. But those bugs were largely theoretical, and the "no regreesions" rule takes precedence. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
