On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:44:09AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 05:40:29PM +0200, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > W dniu 16.05.2014 11:00, Peter Chen pisze: > > >Hi Felipe & Alan, > > > > > >To continue with topic discussed at > > >http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg105279.html, > > >I implement the gadget bus to bind udc to gadget driver follow > > >most ideas from your two. > > > > > > > While the idea is interesting I think some aspects of the implementation > > must be thought over. > > definitely. For example we don't want automatic binding, basically we > might want to have g_mass_storage running on both ports and this series > would prevent it. In current design, the two g_mass_storage can't run at both ports, that's the reason I choose the idea if "if there is bound udc already for this gadget driver, it will not bind any udcs", if you want any gadget driver can bind more than one udcs, I can change gadget bus's match rule. > > I feel this won't be ready until 3.18 or so. Let's see how many problems still be existed? We can fix them one by one. I know it changes udc-core a lot, many things we need to consider and many tests we need to test. -- Best Regards, Peter Chen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
