Hi Alan, On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:35:49AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > @@ -206,6 +208,19 @@ static int ehci_platform_probe(struct platform_device *dev) > > break; > > } > > } > > + > > + priv->rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional(&dev->dev, > > + NULL); > > I hate the style that matches arguments on a continuation line with the > opening paren of the function call, for a couple of reasons. Instead I > simply indent continuation lines by two or more tab stops. But some > people seem to be incurably attached to it. Ok, I'll change it. > > + if (IS_ERR(priv->rst)) { > > + err = PTR_ERR(priv->rst); > > + if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER) > > + goto err_put_clks; > > + priv->rst = NULL; > > + } else { > > + err = reset_control_deassert(priv->rst); > > + if (err) > > + goto err_put_clks; > > + } > > } > > > > if (pdata->big_endian_desc) > > The new code was added inside an "if" statement, which will cause it to > apply only to OF devices. Is there any reason not to put the new code > outside the "if" statement, so it applies to all devices? Hmmm, I did this because so far, the reset framework only handles the DT case. But that's right that it can be extended in the future, I'll update it. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature