On 5/8/2014 3:17 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
Hi Geroge,
On 05/08/2014 11:35 AM, George Cherian wrote:
-static inline void musb_platform_reset(struct musb *musb)
+static inline int musb_platform_reset(struct musb *musb)
{
- if (musb->ops->reset)
- musb->ops->reset(musb);
+ if (!musb->ops->reset)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return musb->ops->reset(musb);
}
static inline int musb_platform_get_vbus_status(struct musb *musb)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c
index 74c4193..8438200 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c
@@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static int dsps_musb_set_mode(struct musb *musb, u8 mode)
return 0;
}
-static void dsps_musb_reset(struct musb *musb)
+static int dsps_musb_reset(struct musb *musb)
{
struct device *dev = musb->controller;
struct dsps_glue *glue = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
@@ -548,6 +548,7 @@ static void dsps_musb_reset(struct musb *musb)
usleep_range(100, 200);
usb_phy_init(musb->xceiv);
+ return 1;
Could we follow the general kernel rule here and return 0 for success,
and < 0 on failure?
I made this to return 1, just because the next patch in the series would
make it
return session_restart. Depending on which the musb_platform_reset()
would return
whether actual reset of IP (reset_done) is done or not .
Thanks,
Daniel
--
-George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
