On 04/02/2014 06:05 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 11:46:51AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c >> index 3372ded..e2fd263 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c >> @@ -470,8 +470,9 @@ static int dsps_musb_exit(struct musb *musb) >> struct dsps_glue *glue = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent); >> >> del_timer_sync(&glue->timer); >> - >> usb_phy_shutdown(musb->xceiv); >> + debugfs_remove_recursive(glue->dbgfs_root); >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> @@ -708,8 +709,6 @@ static int dsps_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); >> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); >> >> - debugfs_remove_recursive(glue->dbgfs_root); > > I don't think this is the right fix. debugfs_remove_recursive is > supposed to remove the directory as well. Why isn't dsps_musb_exit() > called ? dsps_musb_exit() is called, hence my fix works :) The question is rather why dsps_remove() isn't called. For me, the fix looked obvious, as resources that are claimed in dsps_musb_init() should obviously be freed in its counterpart function, dsps_musb_exit(). For reasons of readability if not for any other :) Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
