On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 00:34 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 03/20/2014 01:04 AM, Cédric Cabessa wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c b/drivers/staging/usbip/vhci_hcd.c [] > > @@ -271,12 +271,14 @@ static int vhci_hub_control(struct usb_hcd *hcd, u16 typeReq, u16 wValue, > > } > > break; > > case USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER: > > - usbip_dbg_vhci_rh(" ClearPortFeature: USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER\n"); > > + usbip_dbg_vhci_rh( > > + " ClearPortFeature: USB_PORT_FEAT_POWER\n"); > > Your version of scripts/checkpatch.pl seems outdated. It shouldn't > complain about strings violating 80-column limit (and I've just verified it > doesn't). checkpatch complains about > 80 char lines for lines with a function where the function name isn't understood to be a logging use. uspip_dbg_<foo> doesn't take the general form so if the string at the EOL exceeds 80 chars, a message is emitted. Long standalone strings on a single line do not get warnings. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html