From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Although an interesting concept, I don't think that this is a good idea:
-This will result in lots of "virtual" scsi controllers confusing users
-If we get a scsi-bus-reset we will now need to do a usb-device-reset of all
uas devices on the same usb bus, which is something to avoid if possible
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
index 08e9710f193d..a7ac97cc5949 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/uas.c
@@ -1050,12 +1050,6 @@ static void uas_free_streams(struct uas_dev_info *devinfo)
usb_free_streams(devinfo->intf, eps, 3, GFP_KERNEL);
}
-/*
- * XXX: What I'd like to do here is register a SCSI host for each USB host in
- * the system. Follow usb-storage's design of registering a SCSI host for
- * each USB device for the moment. Can implement this by walking up the
- * USB hierarchy until we find a USB host.
- */
static int uas_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
{
int result = -ENOMEM;
--
1.8.5.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
