On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:32 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 oliver@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > Define usb_lock_port and usb_unlock_port in all cases > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > > > index 28d1218..68d077e 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > > > @@ -3849,6 +3849,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_unlocked_enable_lpm); > > > #define hub_suspend NULL > > > #define hub_resume NULL > > > #define hub_reset_resume NULL > > > +#define usb_lock_port NULL > > > +#define usb_unlock_port NULL > > > > You're not serious, are you? What do you think the compiler will do > > with a line like: > > Yes, sorry, too much deadlines to meet. I know what you mean. Real life does have a tendency to intrude. One of the nice things about doing work on the kernel is that we don't have to worry about any real deadlines. :-) Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
