On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:50:05AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > @@ -18,6 +18,19 @@
> > memory {
> > reg = <0x10000000 0x80000000>;
> > };
> > +
> > + regulators {
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
>
> This is _not_ a simple bus. It doesn't have the required ranges
> property.
Maybe the real question is that if the required ranges property is
missing, why kernel still accepts it as a simple bus and populate the
devices under it?
>
> Why do these need to be in a regulators container node? We don't group
> dma controllers under a dmas node, or uarts under a uarts node.
Grouping fixed clocks under 'clocks' and fixed regulators under
'regulators' is a common pattern which can be found on most of the ARM
dts files.
Shawn
>
> > +
> > + reg_usb_otg_vbus: usb_otg_vbus {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "usb_otg_vbus";
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > + gpio = <&gpio4 15 0>;
> > + enable-active-low;
> > + };
> > + };
> > };
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
