In commit e117e742 (usb: gadget: add "maxpacket_limit" field to struct usb_ep) usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit() function was used incorrectly in at91udc_probe() function, when maxpacket value should be set to instances of struct at91_ep, not struct usb_ep. This patch fix this by reverting original code. Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hello, This patch is reply for problem discussed here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg100241.html Best regards Robert Baldyga Samsung R&D Institute Poland drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c index 0353b64..dc7a7c2 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c @@ -1759,15 +1759,15 @@ static int at91udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* newer chips have more FIFO memory than rm9200 */ if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() || cpu_is_at91sam9g20()) { - usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&udc->ep[0], 64); - usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&udc->ep[3], 64); - usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&udc->ep[4], 512); - usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&udc->ep[5], 512); + udc->ep[0].maxpacket = 64; + udc->ep[3].maxpacket = 64; + udc->ep[4].maxpacket = 512; + udc->ep[5].maxpacket = 512; } else if (cpu_is_at91sam9261() || cpu_is_at91sam9g10()) { - usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&udc->ep[3], 64); + udc->ep[3].maxpacket = 64; } else if (cpu_is_at91sam9263()) { - usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&udc->ep[0], 64); - usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&udc->ep[3], 64); + udc->ep[0].maxpacket = 64; + udc->ep[3].maxpacket = 64; } udc->udp_baseaddr = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res)); -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
