On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 07:09:44PM +0100, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 6:39 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 4:46 PM Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Let FSCONFIG_SET_FD handle O_PATH file descriptors. This is particularly > > > useful in the context of overlayfs where layers can be specified via > > > file descriptors instead of paths. But userspace must currently use > > > non-O_PATH file desriptors which is often pointless especially if > > > the file descriptors have been created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). > > > > > > > Shall we? > > Fixes: a08557d19ef41 ("ovl: specify layers via file descriptors") > > > > I think that was the intention of the API and we are not far enough to fix > > it in 6.12.y. > > > > Oh it's not in 6.12. it's in 6.13, so less important to backport I guess. > > Thanks, > Amir. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > fs/fs_parser.c | 12 +++++++----- > > > fs/fsopen.c | 7 +++++-- > > > fs/overlayfs/params.c | 10 ++++++---- > > > include/linux/fs_context.h | 1 + > > > include/linux/fs_parser.h | 6 +++--- > > > 5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/fs_parser.c b/fs/fs_parser.c > > > index e635a81e17d9..35aaea224007 100644 > > > --- a/fs/fs_parser.c > > > +++ b/fs/fs_parser.c > > > @@ -310,15 +310,17 @@ int fs_param_is_fd(struct p_log *log, const struct fs_parameter_spec *p, > > > } > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(fs_param_is_fd); > > > > > > -int fs_param_is_file_or_string(struct p_log *log, > > > - const struct fs_parameter_spec *p, > > > - struct fs_parameter *param, > > > - struct fs_parse_result *result) > > > +int fs_param_is_raw_file_or_string(struct p_log *log, > > > > Besides being too long of a helper name I do not think > > that it correctly reflects the spirit of the question. > > > > The arguments for overlayfs upperdir/workdir/lowerdir+/datadir+ > > need to be *a path*, either a path string, or an O_PATH fd and > > maybe later on also dirfd+name. > > > > I imagine that if other filesystems would want to use this parser > > helper they would need it for the same purpose. > > > > Can we maybe come up with a name that better reflects that > > intention? > > > > > + const struct fs_parameter_spec *p, > > > + struct fs_parameter *param, > > > + struct fs_parse_result *result) > > > { > > > switch (param->type) { > > > case fs_value_is_string: > > > return fs_param_is_string(log, p, param, result); > > > case fs_value_is_file: > > > + fallthrough; > > > + case fs_value_is_raw_file: > > > result->uint_32 = param->dirfd; > > > if (result->uint_32 <= INT_MAX) > > > return 0; > > > @@ -328,7 +330,7 @@ int fs_param_is_file_or_string(struct p_log *log, > > > } > > > return fs_param_bad_value(log, param); > > > } > > > -EXPORT_SYMBOL(fs_param_is_file_or_string); > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fs_param_is_raw_file_or_string); > > > > > > int fs_param_is_uid(struct p_log *log, const struct fs_parameter_spec *p, > > > struct fs_parameter *param, struct fs_parse_result *result) > > > diff --git a/fs/fsopen.c b/fs/fsopen.c > > > index 094a7f510edf..3b5fc9f1f774 100644 > > > --- a/fs/fsopen.c > > > +++ b/fs/fsopen.c > > > @@ -451,11 +451,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(fsconfig, > > > param.size = strlen(param.name->name); > > > break; > > > case FSCONFIG_SET_FD: > > > - param.type = fs_value_is_file; > > > ret = -EBADF; > > > - param.file = fget(aux); > > > + param.file = fget_raw(aux); > > > if (!param.file) > > > goto out_key; > > > + if (param.file->f_mode & FMODE_PATH) > > > + param.type = fs_value_is_raw_file; > > > + else > > > + param.type = fs_value_is_file; > > > param.dirfd = aux; > > > > Here it even shouts more to me that the distinction is not needed. > > > > If the parameter would be defined as > > fsparam_path_description("workdir", Opt_workdir), > > and we set param.type = fs_value_is_path_fd; > > unconditional to f_mode & FMODE_PATH, because we > > do not care if fd is O_PATH or not for the purpose of this parameter > > we only care that the parameter *can* be resolved to a path > > and *how* to resolve it to a path, and the answer to those questions > > does not change depending on _mode & FMODE_PATH. > > > > I admit that that's a very long rant about a mostly meaningless nuance, > > and I was also not very involved in the development of the new mount API > > so there may be things about it that I don't understand, so feel free to > > dismiss this rant and add my Ack if you do not share my concerns. So the reason I originally carried this distinction into the api was that autofs can't use O_PATH fds. It needs a fully functional pipe. And I was worried that just enabling them would break it. That's probably not an issue because the code checks if (!(pipe->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_WRITE)) which isn't set for FMODE_PATH/O_PATH file descriptors. So that's probably safe. So I agree we could erradicate this distinction for now.