Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: f06ce441457d Merge tag 'loongarch-fixes-6.10-1' of git://g.. git tree: upstream console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1435a032980000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=eb72437243175f22 dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5ce16f43e888965f009d compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40 Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. Downloadable assets: disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/00ecb7bdd1a8/disk-f06ce441.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/3926ab949197/vmlinux-f06ce441.xz kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/36849eea4fc5/bzImage-f06ce441.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+5ce16f43e888965f009d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00007-gf06ce441457d #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.3/17052 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888022903468 (&pipe->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: iter_file_splice_write+0x335/0x14e0 fs/splice.c:687 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880292be420 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_splice+0xcf0/0x1900 fs/splice.c:1353 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1655 [inline] sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1791 mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:409 ovl_create_object+0x13b/0x370 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:642 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3505 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3574 [inline] path_openat+0x1425/0x3280 fs/namei.c:3804 do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3834 do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1405 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1420 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1436 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1431 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x2a0 fs/open.c:1431 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #3 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth] ){++++}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526 inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:801 [inline] lookup_slow+0x45/0x70 fs/namei.c:1708 walk_component+0x2e1/0x410 fs/namei.c:2004 lookup_last fs/namei.c:2469 [inline] path_lookupat+0x16f/0x450 fs/namei.c:2493 filename_lookup+0x256/0x610 fs/namei.c:2522 kern_path+0x35/0x50 fs/namei.c:2630 lookup_bdev+0xc5/0x290 block/bdev.c:1157 resume_store+0x1a0/0x710 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1235 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3a1/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline] vfs_write+0xa72/0xc90 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:643 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 kernfs_seq_start+0x53/0x3b0 fs/kernfs/file.c:154 seq_read_iter+0x3d0/0xd60 fs/seq_file.c:225 do_iter_readv_writev+0x5a4/0x800 vfs_readv+0x2b6/0xa90 fs/read_write.c:932 do_preadv fs/read_write.c:1049 [inline] __do_sys_preadv fs/read_write.c:1099 [inline] __se_sys_preadv fs/read_write.c:1094 [inline] __x64_sys_preadv+0x1c7/0x2d0 fs/read_write.c:1094 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #1 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 seq_read_iter+0xb7/0xd60 fs/seq_file.c:182 copy_splice_read+0x662/0xb60 fs/splice.c:365 do_splice_read fs/splice.c:985 [inline] splice_file_to_pipe+0x299/0x500 fs/splice.c:1295 do_sendfile+0x515/0xe10 fs/read_write.c:1301 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1356 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64+0x100/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:1348 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&pipe->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 iter_file_splice_write+0x335/0x14e0 fs/splice.c:687 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:941 [inline] do_splice+0xd77/0x1900 fs/splice.c:1354 __do_splice fs/splice.c:1436 [inline] __do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1652 [inline] __se_sys_splice+0x331/0x4a0 fs/splice.c:1634 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &pipe->mutex --> &ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth] --> sb_writers#4 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(sb_writers#4); lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]); lock(sb_writers#4); lock(&pipe->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.3/17052: #0: ffff8880292be420 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_splice+0xcf0/0x1900 fs/splice.c:1353 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 17052 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc2-syzkaller-00007-gf06ce441457d #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 iter_file_splice_write+0x335/0x14e0 fs/splice.c:687 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:941 [inline] do_splice+0xd77/0x1900 fs/splice.c:1354 __do_splice fs/splice.c:1436 [inline] __do_sys_splice fs/splice.c:1652 [inline] __se_sys_splice+0x331/0x4a0 fs/splice.c:1634 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f93d627cf69 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f93d5dde0c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000113 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f93d63b4070 RCX: 00007f93d627cf69 RDX: 0000000000000005 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000004 RBP: 00007f93d62da706 R08: 00000000ffffffe1 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f93d63b4070 R15: 00007ffc1c7ac468 </TASK> --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with: #syz fix: exact-commit-title If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with: #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard) If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with: #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report If you want to undo deduplication, reply with: #syz undup
