Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] overlayfs.rst: fix ReST formatting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 4:07 AM Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:34:22 +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > Fix some indentation issues and fix missing newlines in quoted text
> > by converting quoted text to code blocks.
> >
> > Unindent a) b) enumerated list to workaround github displaying it
> > as numbered list.
>
> I don't think we need to work around github's weird behavior around
> enumerated lists.  What matters for us is what Sphinx (+ our own
> extensions) ends up generating.
>
> The corresponding html page rendered by Sphinx is at:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/overlayfs.html#permission-model
>
> It does not look perfect, but at least it preserves enumeration by
> number and alphabet.
>

ok.

> I'd suggest reporting github about the minor breakage of their
> rst renderer.
>
> Further comments below:
>
> >
> > Reported-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Suggested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst | 63 +++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
> > index 926396fdc5eb..a36f3a2a2d4b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
> > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ Where both upper and lower objects are directories, a merged directory
> >  is formed.
> >
> >  At mount time, the two directories given as mount options "lowerdir" and
> > -"upperdir" are combined into a merged directory:
> > +"upperdir" are combined into a merged directory::
> >
> >    mount -t overlay overlay -olowerdir=/lower,upperdir=/upper,\
> >    workdir=/work /merged
> > @@ -174,10 +174,10 @@ programs.
> >  seek offsets are assigned sequentially when the directories are read.
> >  Thus if
> >
> > -  - read part of a directory
> > -  - remember an offset, and close the directory
> > -  - re-open the directory some time later
> > -  - seek to the remembered offset
> > +- read part of a directory
> > +- remember an offset, and close the directory
> > +- re-open the directory some time later
> > +- seek to the remembered offset
>
> To my eyes, unindent spoils the readability of this file as pure
> plain text.  Please don't do this.
>

Ok. I see what you mean.
I restored a single space indent.
I don't see why double space is called for and it is inconsistent
with indentation in the rest of the doc.

> >
> >  there may be little correlation between the old and new locations in
> >  the list of filenames, particularly if anything has changed in the
> > @@ -285,21 +285,21 @@ Permission model
> >
> >  Permission checking in the overlay filesystem follows these principles:
> >
> > - 1) permission check SHOULD return the same result before and after copy up
> > +1) permission check SHOULD return the same result before and after copy up
> >
> > - 2) task creating the overlay mount MUST NOT gain additional privileges
> > +2) task creating the overlay mount MUST NOT gain additional privileges
> >
> > - 3) non-mounting task MAY gain additional privileges through the overlay,
> > - compared to direct access on underlying lower or upper filesystems
> > +3) non-mounting task MAY gain additional privileges through the overlay,
> > +   compared to direct access on underlying lower or upper filesystems
>
> All you need to fix is this adjustment of indent.
> Don't do other unindents please
>

OK. I also fixed the same indents in "Non-standard behavior".

> >
> > -This is achieved by performing two permission checks on each access
> > +This is achieved by performing two permission checks on each access:
> >
> > - a) check if current task is allowed access based on local DAC (owner,
> > -    group, mode and posix acl), as well as MAC checks
> > +a) check if current task is allowed access based on local DAC (owner,
> > +group, mode and posix acl), as well as MAC checks
> >
> > - b) check if mounting task would be allowed real operation on lower or
> > -    upper layer based on underlying filesystem permissions, again including
> > -    MAC checks
> > +b) check if mounting task would be allowed real operation on lower or
> > +upper layer based on underlying filesystem permissions, again including
> > +MAC checks
>
> Your workaround harms the readability very badly.
> Don't break the construct of enumerated (or numbered) list in rst.
>

ok.

> For the specification of enumerated list, please see:
>
> https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#enumerated-lists
>
> If there is a rst parser who fails to recognize some of the defined
> list structure, fix such a parser please!
>
> >
> >  Check (a) ensures consistency (1) since owner, group, mode and posix acls
> >  are copied up.  On the other hand it can result in server enforced
> > @@ -311,11 +311,11 @@ to create setups where the consistency rule (1) does not hold; normally,
> >  however, the mounting task will have sufficient privileges to perform all
> >  operations.
> >
> > -Another way to demonstrate this model is drawing parallels between
> > +Another way to demonstrate this model is drawing parallels between::
> >
> >    mount -t overlay overlay -olowerdir=/lower,upperdir=/upper,... /merged
> >
> > -and
> > +and::
> >
> >    cp -a /lower /upper
> >    mount --bind /upper /merged
> > @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ Multiple lower layers
> >  ---------------------
> >
> >  Multiple lower layers can now be given using the colon (":") as a
> > -separator character between the directory names.  For example:
> > +separator character between the directory names.  For example::
> >
> >    mount -t overlay overlay -olowerdir=/lower1:/lower2:/lower3 /merged
> >
> > @@ -340,13 +340,13 @@ rightmost one and going left.  In the above example lower1 will be the
> >  top, lower2 the middle and lower3 the bottom layer.
> >
> >  Note: directory names containing colons can be provided as lower layer by
> > -escaping the colons with a single backslash.  For example:
> > +escaping the colons with a single backslash.  For example::
> >
> >    mount -t overlay overlay -olowerdir=/a\:lower\:\:dir /merged
> >
> >  Since kernel version v6.8, directory names containing colons can also
> >  be configured as lower layer using the "lowerdir+" mount options and the
> > -fsconfig syscall from new mount api.  For example:
> > +fsconfig syscall from new mount api.  For example::
> >
> >    fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir+", "/a:lower::dir", 0);
> >
> > @@ -390,11 +390,11 @@ Data-only lower layers
> >  With "metacopy" feature enabled, an overlayfs regular file may be a composition
> >  of information from up to three different layers:
> >
> > - 1) metadata from a file in the upper layer
> > +1) metadata from a file in the upper layer
> >
> > - 2) st_ino and st_dev object identifier from a file in a lower layer
> > +2) st_ino and st_dev object identifier from a file in a lower layer
> >
> > - 3) data from a file in another lower layer (further below)
> > +3) data from a file in another lower layer (further below)
>
> Ditto.
>
> >
> >  The "lower data" file can be on any lower layer, except from the top most
> >  lower layer.
> > @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ A normal lower layer is not allowed to be below a data-only layer, so single
> >  colon separators are not allowed to the right of double colon ("::") separators.
> >
> >
> > -For example:
> > +For example::
> >
> >    mount -t overlay overlay -olowerdir=/l1:/l2:/l3::/do1::/do2 /merged
> >
> > @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ to the absolute path of the "lower data" file in the "data-only" lower layer.
> >
> >  Since kernel version v6.8, "data-only" lower layers can also be added using
> >  the "datadir+" mount options and the fsconfig syscall from new mount api.
> > -For example:
> > +For example::
> >
> >    fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir+", "/l1", 0);
> >    fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir+", "/l2", 0);
> > @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ For example:
> >
> >
> >  fs-verity support
> > -----------------------
> > +-----------------
> >
> >  During metadata copy up of a lower file, if the source file has
> >  fs-verity enabled and overlay verity support is enabled, then the
> > @@ -653,9 +653,10 @@ following rules apply:
> >     encode an upper file handle from upper inode
> >
> >  The encoded overlay file handle includes:
> > - - Header including path type information (e.g. lower/upper)
> > - - UUID of the underlying filesystem
> > - - Underlying filesystem encoding of underlying inode
> > +
> > +- Header including path type information (e.g. lower/upper)
> > +- UUID of the underlying filesystem
> > +- Underlying filesystem encoding of underlying inode
>
> Ditto.
>

ok, but inconsistent indentation between numbered and bullet list is
also not nice:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/overlayfs.html#nfs-export

so I kept this indent and I also indented the non-indented numbered lists
in this section to conform to the rest of the numbered lists in this doc.

I've pushed the fixes to overlayfs-next.
Kept RVB from Bagas, because your comment about the unindent is
aligned with Bagas' initial review comment.

Thanks,
Amir.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux