On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 15:17, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry, you asked about ovl mount. > To me it makes sense that if users observe ovl paths in writable mapped > memory, that ovl should not be remounted RO. > Anyway, I don't see a good reason to allow remount RO for ovl in that case. > Is there? Agreed. But is preventing remount RO important enough to warrant special casing of backing file in generic code? I'm not convinced either way... Thanks, Miklos
