Re: [PATCH] ovl: avoid possible NULL dereference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: avoid possible NULL dereference
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 07:45:11 +0300
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>, miklos@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-unionfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <b1a6134d-f976-ed9d-aac0-06f3c93fc1c6@nfschina.com>

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 09:12:01AM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> Got it, I'm so careless that make this wrong patch.

Not at all.  Your patch didn't break anything and this stuff is subtle.
I've done the same thing myself.

regards,
dan carpenter

References:
- Re: [PATCH] ovl: avoid possible NULL dereference
  - From: Dan Carpenter
- Re: [PATCH] ovl: avoid possible NULL dereference
  - From: Su Hui

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ovl: avoid possible NULL dereference
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ovl: move ovl_file_accessed() to aio completion
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ovl: avoid possible NULL dereference
Next by thread: Re: [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in delete_one_xattr (2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems Devel] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux