On Wed 09-08-23 09:06:34, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > On Mon 07-08-23 15:38:37, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > In later patches, we're going to drop the "now" parameter from the > > > update_time operation. Prepare ubifs for this, by having it use the new > > > inode_update_timestamps helper. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > One comment below: > > > > > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/file.c b/fs/ubifs/file.c > > > index df9086b19cd0..2d0178922e19 100644 > > > --- a/fs/ubifs/file.c > > > +++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c > > > @@ -1397,15 +1397,9 @@ int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *time, > > > return err; > > > > > > mutex_lock(&ui->ui_mutex); > > > - if (flags & S_ATIME) > > > - inode->i_atime = *time; > > > - if (flags & S_CTIME) > > > - inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, *time); > > > - if (flags & S_MTIME) > > > - inode->i_mtime = *time; > > > - > > > - release = ui->dirty; > > > + inode_update_timestamps(inode, flags); > > > __mark_inode_dirty(inode, I_DIRTY_SYNC); > > > + release = ui->dirty; > > > mutex_unlock(&ui->ui_mutex); > > > > I think this is wrong. You need to keep sampling ui->dirty before calling > > __mark_inode_dirty(). Otherwise you could release budget for inode update > > you really need... > > Fixed in-tree. Thanks. With that feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
