On Sat, 27 May 2023 at 16:04, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If we would want to support data-only layers in the middle on the > stack, which would this syntax make sense? > lowerdir=lower1::data1:lower2::data2 > > If this syntax makes sense to everyone, then we can change the syntax > of data-only in the tail from lower1::data1:data2 to lower1::data1::data2 > and enforce that after the first ::, only :: are allowed. > > Miklos, any thoughts? > I have a feeling that this was your natural interpretation when you first > saw the :: syntax. Yes, I think it's more natural to have a prefix for each data-only layer. And this is also good for extensibility, as discussed. Thanks, Miklos
