Re: Detaching lower layers (Was: Lazy Loading Layers)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/29/23 17:15, Amir Goldstein wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:54 PM Sargun Dhillon <sargun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

One of the projects I'm playing with for containers is lazy-loading of layers.
We've found that less than 10% of the files on a layer actually get used, which
is an unfortunate waste. It also means in some cases downloading ~100s of MB, or
~1s of GB of files before starting a container workload. This is unfortunate.

It would be nice if there was a way to start a container workload, and have
it so that if it tries to access and unpopulated (not yet downloaded) part
of the filesystem block while trying to be accessed. This is trivial to do
if the "lowest" layer is FUSE, where one can just stall in userspace on
loads. Unfortunately, AFAIK, there's not a good way to swap out the FUSE
filesystem with the "real" filesystem once it's done fully populating,
and you have to pay for the full FUSE cost on each read / write.

I've tossed around:
1. Mutable lowerdirs and having something like this:

layer0 --> Writeable space
layer1 --> Real XFS filesystem
layer2 --> FUSE FS

and if there is a "miss" on layer 1, it will then look it up on
layer 2 while layer 1 is being populated. Then the FUSE FS can block.
This is neat, but it requires the FUSE FS to always be up, and incurs
a userspace bounce on every miss.

Interesting.

I haven't checked the patches yet, but does the patchset "FUSE BPF: A Stacked Filesystem Extension for FUSE" help with your use case, Sargun?



Best,
Rodrigo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux