On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 02:42:54PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 02:30:20PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This version looks good to me, but I'd really prefer if a reiserfs > > insider could look over the reiserfs patches. > > I consider this material for v6.4 even with an -rc8 for v6.3. So there's > time but we shouldn't block it on reiserfs. Especially, since it's > marked deprecated. So I've applied this now. If there's still someone interested in checking the reiserfs bits more than what we did with xfstests they should please do so. But I don't want to hold up this series waiting for that to happen. > > Fwiw, I've tested reiserfs with xfstests on a kernel with and without > this series applied and there's no regressions. But it's overall pretty > buggy at least according to xfstests. Which is expected, I guess.
