Re: [PATCH] fs/overlayfs: fix comments mentioning i_mutex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/overlayfs: fix comments mentioning i_mutex
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:21:19 +0100
Cc: overlayfs <linux-unionfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20220211030055.95334-1-hongnan.li@linux.alibaba.com>

On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 04:00, Hongnan Li <hongnan.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: hongnanli <hongnan.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> inode->i_mutex has been replaced with inode->i_rwsem long ago. Fix
> comments still mentioning i_mutex.

IMO "inode lock" is more descriptive.

Thanks,
Miklos

References:
- [PATCH] fs/overlayfs: fix comments mentioning i_mutex
  - From: Hongnan Li

Prev by Date: Question about fsync in copy-up operaton
Next by Date: Re: Question about fsync in copy-up operaton
Previous by thread: [PATCH] fs/overlayfs: fix comments mentioning i_mutex
Next by thread: Question about fsync in copy-up operaton
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems Devel] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux