On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 7:22 AM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 06:19, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 18:43, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 6:24 PM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 12:43, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 6:20 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On the first getdents call, ovl_iterate() populates the readdir cache > > > > > > with a list of entries, but for upper entries with origin lower inode, > > > > > > p->ino remains zero. > > > > > > > > > > > > Following getdents calls traverse the readdir cache list and call > > > > > > ovl_cache_update_ino() for entries with zero p->ino to lookup the entry > > > > > > in the overlay and return d_ino that is consistent with st_ino. > > > > > > > > > > > > If the upper file was unlinked between the first getdents call and the > > > > > > getdents call that lists the file entry, ovl_cache_update_ino() will not > > > > > > find the entry and fall back to setting d_ino to the upper real st_ino, > > > > > > which is inconsistent with how this object was presented to users. > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of listing a stale entry with inconsistent d_ino, simply skip > > > > > > the stale entry, which is better for users. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Miklos, > > > > > > > > > > I forgot to follow up on this patch. > > > > > Upstream xfstest overlay/077 is failing without this patch. > > > > > > > > Can't reproduce (on ext4/xfs and "-oxino=on"). > > > > > > > > Is there some trick? > > > > > > Not sure. overlay/077 fails for me on v5.14.0-rc2 on ext4/xfs. > > > > > > QA output created by 077 > > > +entry m100 has inconsistent d_ino (234 != 232) > > > +entry f100 has inconsistent d_ino (335 != 16777542) > > > Silence is golden > > > > > > Maybe you need to build src/t_dir_offset2? > > > > root@kvm:/opt/xfstests-dev# git log -1 --pretty=%h > > 10f6b231 > > root@kvm:/opt/xfstests-dev# cat local.config > > export TEST_DEV=/dev/vdb1 > > export TEST_DIR=/test > > export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/vdb2 > > export SCRATCH_MNT=/scratch > > export FSTYP=ext4 > > export OVERLAY_MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o xino=on" > > root@kvm:/opt/xfstests-dev# make src/t_dir_offset2 > > make: 'src/t_dir_offset2' is up to date. > > root@kvm:/opt/xfstests-dev# ./check -overlay overlay/077 > > FSTYP -- overlay > > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 kvm 5.14.0-rc2 #276 SMP Tue Jul 20 > > 05:54:44 CEST 2021 > > MKFS_OPTIONS -- /scratch > > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o xino=on /scratch /scratch/ovl-mnt > > > > overlay/077 1s ... 1s > > Ran: overlay/077 > > Passed all 1 tests > > > > root@kvm:/opt/xfstests-dev# cat results/overlay/077.full > > > > Create file in pure upper dir: > > getdents at offset 0 returned 192 bytes > > created entry p0 > > entry p0 found as expected > > > > Remove file in pure upper dir: > > getdents at offset 0 returned 192 bytes > > unlinked entry p100 > > entry p100 not found as expected > > > > Create file in impure upper dir: > > getdents at offset 0 returned 192 bytes > > created entry o0 > > entry o0 found as expected > > > > Remove file in impure upper dir: > > getdents at offset 0 returned 192 bytes > > unlinked entry o100 > > entry o100 not found as expected > > > > Create file in merge dir: > > getdents at offset 0 returned 192 bytes > > created entry m0 > > entry m0 found as expected > > > > Remove file in merge dir: > > getdents at offset 0 returned 192 bytes > > unlinked entry m100 > > entry m100 not found as expected > > > > Create file in former merge dir: > > getdents at offset 0 returned 192 bytes > > created entry f0 > > entry f0 found as expected > > > > Remove file in former merge dir: > > getdents at offset 0 returned 192 bytes > > unlinked entry f100 > > entry f100 not found as expected > > > > Ideas for further debugging why this test isn't failing for v4.12-rc2? > It's not you, it's me ;-) The failure was lost during cleanup of t_dir_offset2 patches for submission and it is I who was running an older version of t_dir_offset2. Let me figure this out and get back to you with a working test. Thanks, Amir.
