On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:49 PM www <ouyangxuan10@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Amir, > > > > At 2021-05-01 00:16:28, "Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 12:59 PM www <ouyangxuan10@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Amir, > >> > >> > >> Thank you very much for your help. I have another question to clarify. > >> > >> >> 3. If we upgrade overlayfs separately, we are not very good at verifying that we have solved this problem, because the recurrence probability of this problem is very low. So I want to ask, how can we quickly reproduce this problem? > >> > >> >Re-creating a lower squashfs after files have been copied to upper should > >> >reproduce the problem quite often. > >> > >> Does the re-creating lower squashfs here mean that remount squashfs? > >> I've tested dozens of times in the remount way, but I haven't found this problem again? > >> My test steps are: > >> 1). umount lower squashfs; > >> 2). modify the file in upper dir; > >> 3). mount lower squanshfs; > >> 4). restart service(it will re-parse the modified file) or reboot the system and the problem didn't happen. > >> > > > >No. That's not what I mean by re-creating lower fs. > >What I mean is that overlayfs is the file is question is in the squashfs > >image and has been copied up. > > > >I don't know where the squashfs image you are using comes from > >but I am guessing you have replaced it with a new squashfs image. > >In the new squashfs image, files have different inode numbers. > > > >I reckon this behavior is common for OpenWRT where the system > >image is being upgraded. > > > https://github.com/openbmc/openbmc/blob/master/meta-phosphor/recipes-phosphor/initrdscripts/files/obmc-init.sh (init file) > ... > line 376: mount /run/image-rofs /run/initramfs/ro -t squanshfs -o ro,loop (line 358, set copy-base-filesystem-to-ram=y) > ... > line 416: mkdir -p $upper/var/log --- new add line, not in the file > line 417: mount -t overlayfs -o lowerdir=run/initramfs/ro,upperdir=run/initramfs/rw/cow,workdir=run/initramfs/rw/work cow /root > ... > I would like to ask if the newly added line(line 416) or "set set copy-base-filesystem-to-ram=y" causes this problem?(This folder is created and the value is set every time the system starts, but the probability of problems is not high) > There are no other changes. > > I don't know. I am not sure what wasn't clear in my answer. The lowerfs image, namely /run/image-rofs in your script can be downloaded from tftp or from the web. I have no idea what actually happens in your setup. Every time you run this init script this lower fs image may change, while the upper f2fs rwfs does not change. When that happens, it MAY cause the reported issue. Thanks, Amir.
