---- 在 星期四, 2021-04-08 23:03:39 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> 撰写 ---- > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 1:40 PM Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > ---- 在 星期四, 2021-04-08 19:29:55 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> 撰写 ---- > > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 1:28 PM Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > ---- 在 星期四, 2021-04-08 19:20:42 Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 撰写 ---- > > > > > In overlayfs copy-up, if open flag has O_TRUNC then upper > > > > > file will truncate to zero size, in this case we should check > > > > > VM_DENYWRITE mappings to keep compatibility with other filesystems. > > > > > > Can you provide a test case for the bug that this is fixing? > > > > > > > Execute binary file(keep running until open) in overlayfs which only has lower && open the binary file with flag O_RDWR|O_TRUNC > > > > Expected result: open fail with -ETXTBSY > > > > Actual result: open success > > Worse, it's possible to get a "Bus error" with just execute and write > on an overlayfs file, which i_writecount is supposed to protect. > > The reason is that the put_write_access() call in __vma_link_file() > assumes an already negative writecount, but because of the vm_file > shuffle in ovl_mmap() that's not guaranteed. There's even a comment > about exactly this situation in mmap(): > > /* ->mmap() can change vma->vm_file, but must guarantee that > * vma_link() below can deny write-access if VM_DENYWRITE is set > * and map writably if VM_SHARED is set. This usually means the > * new file must not have been exposed to user-space, yet. > */ > > The attached patch fixes this, but not your original bug. > > That could be addressed by checking the writecount on *both* lower and > upper for open for write/truncate. Note: this could be checked before > copy-up, but that's not reliable alone, because the copy up could > happen due to meta-data update, for example, and then the > open/truncate wouldn't trigger the writecount check. > > Something like the second attached patch? > Yeah, I noticed that too just after posted my previous patch. However, rethink these two cases, in practice we share lower layers in most use cases especially in container use case. So if we check VM_DENYWRITE of lower file strictly, it may cause interferes between container instances. Maybe only checking upper file will be better option? Thanks, Chengguang
