I see that current implementation of __sync_filesystem() ignores the
return code from ->sync_fs(). I am not sure why that's the case.
Ignoring ->sync_fs() return code is problematic for overlayfs where
it can return error if sync_filesystem() on upper super block failed.
That error will simply be lost and sycnfs(overlay_fd), will get
success (despite the fact it failed).
I am assuming that we want to continue to call __sync_blockdev()
despite the fact that there have been errors reported from
->sync_fs(). So I wrote this simple patch which captures the
error from ->sync_fs() but continues to call __sync_blockdev()
and returns error from sync_fs() if there is one.
There might be some very good reasons to not capture ->sync_fs()
return code, I don't know. Hence thought of proposing this patch.
Atleast I will get to know the reason. I still need to figure
a way out how to propagate overlay sync_fs() errors to user
space.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/sync.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: redhat-linux/fs/sync.c
===================================================================
--- redhat-linux.orig/fs/sync.c 2020-12-16 09:15:49.831565653 -0500
+++ redhat-linux/fs/sync.c 2020-12-16 09:23:42.499853207 -0500
@@ -30,14 +30,18 @@
*/
static int __sync_filesystem(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
{
+ int ret, ret2;
+
if (wait)
sync_inodes_sb(sb);
else
writeback_inodes_sb(sb, WB_REASON_SYNC);
if (sb->s_op->sync_fs)
- sb->s_op->sync_fs(sb, wait);
- return __sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev, wait);
+ ret = sb->s_op->sync_fs(sb, wait);
+ ret2 = __sync_blockdev(sb->s_bdev, wait);
+
+ return ret ? ret : ret2;
}
/*
