Re: [PATCH] overlay: Plumb through flush method

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:16 PM Sargun Dhillon <sargun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 7:00 PM Sargun Dhillon <sargun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Filesystems can implement their own flush method that release
> > resources, or manipulate caches. Currently if one of these
> > filesystems is used with overlayfs, the flush method is not called.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: linux-unionfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/overlayfs/file.c | 11 +++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/file.c b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
> > index efccb7c1f9bc..802259f33c28 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
> > @@ -787,6 +787,16 @@ static loff_t ovl_remap_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> >                             remap_flags, op);
> >  }
> >
> > +static int ovl_flush(struct file *file, fl_owner_t id)
> > +{
> > +       struct file *realfile = file->private_data;
> > +
> > +       if (realfile->f_op->flush)
> > +               return realfile->f_op->flush(realfile, id);
> > +
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  const struct file_operations ovl_file_operations = {
> >         .open           = ovl_open,
> >         .release        = ovl_release,
> > @@ -798,6 +808,7 @@ const struct file_operations ovl_file_operations = {
> >         .fallocate      = ovl_fallocate,
> >         .fadvise        = ovl_fadvise,
> >         .unlocked_ioctl = ovl_ioctl,
> > +       .flush          = ovl_flush,
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> >         .compat_ioctl   = ovl_compat_ioctl,
> >  #endif
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> Amir, Miklos,
> Is this acceptable? I discovered this being a problem when we had the discussion
> of whether the volatile fs should return an error on close on dirty files.

Yes, looks ok.
Maybe we want to check if the realfile is upper although
maybe flush can release resources also on read only fs?

>
> It seems like it would be useful if anyone uses NFS, or CIFS as an upperdir.

They are not supported as upperdir. only FUSE is.

Thanks,
Amir.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux