Re: [ANNOUNCE] unionmount-testsuite: master branch updated to 9c60a9c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:38 AM Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 07:40:58PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The master branch on the unionmount-testsuite tree [1] has been updated.
> >
> > Changes in this update:
> > - Support user configurable underlying filesystem
> >
> > So far, unionmount-testsuite used hardcoded paths for layers and
> > mount point.  Using underlying filesystem other than tmpfs was possible,
> > but not very easy to setup.
> >
> > This update brings the ability for user to configure custom paths
> > with a custom filesystem for the underlying layers.
> > This is intended to be used for integration with xfstests [2].
> >
> > Here is an excerpt from the README:
> > ---
> >   The following environment variables are supported:
> >
> >   UNIONMOUNT_BASEDIR  - parent dir of all samefs layers (default: /base)
>
> Hi Amir,
>
> I am running these tests with.
>
> UNIONMOUNT_BASEDIR="/mnt/foo/"

I suspect there is a bug with trailing / in UNIONMOUNT_BASEDIR
I did not test with trailing /
Can you try without it?

>
> - ./run --ov runs fine. But when I try to run it again it complains
>   that.
>
>   rm: cannot remove '/mnt/overlayfs//m': Device or resource busy
>
> So I have to first unmount /mnt/overlayfs/m/ and then run tests
> again.
>
> I think it will be nice if it can clear the environment by itself.
>

It should.
All the tests I tried cleaned up previous test env automatically.
The only case where explicit cleanup is needed is before changing
context and modifying envvars.

> - I am running one the recent kernel (5.7.0+) and following errors
>   out.
>
> # ./run --ov --verify
> Environment variables:
> UNIONMOUNT_BASEDIR=/mnt/overlayfs/
>
> ***
> *** ./run --ov --samefs --ts=0 open-plain
> ***
> TEST open-plain.py:10: Open O_RDONLY
> /mnt/overlayfs/m/a/foo100: not on union mount
>
> Will spend more time to figure out what happened.
>
> - I am planning to use these environment variables and run overlay over
>   virtiofs tests. Can I do the same thing with xfstests overlay tests.
>   In README.overlay I see that I need to specify two separate devices.
>   Can I specify to directories (and not devices) to be used as TEST
>   and SCRATCH and run overlay test.

As far as I can tell, SCRATCH_DEV and TEST_DEV are directories
in all those non-block filesystems including virtiofs:
_scratch_mkfs()
...
      case $FSTYP in
        nfs*|cifs|ceph|overlay|glusterfs|pvfs2|9p|virtiofs)
                # unable to re-create this fstyp, just remove all files in
                # $SCRATCH_MNT to avoid EEXIST caused by the leftover files
                # created in previous runs
                _scratch_cleanup_files

So I think you just need to set SCRATCH_DEV and TEST_DEV to
two different directories and you are good to go for running
check or check -overlay.

Thanks,
Amir.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux