Re: [PATCH v12] ovl: improve syncfs efficiency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >> In high density container environment, especially for temporary jobs,
> >> this is quite unwilling  behavior. Should we provide an option to
> >> mitigate this effect for containers which don't care about dirty data?
> >>
> >
> > This is not the first time this sort of suggestion has been made:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/4bc73729-5d85-36b7-0768-ae5952ae05e9@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#md5fc5d51852016da7e042f5d9e5ef7a6d21ea822
>
> The link above seems just my mail thread in mail list.
>

Heh sorry. Wrong link. Here it is:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/CAMp4zn9NsrdByVzWbThBd7Y0DsufJnqp=LdbDscbtyZx82E0Ug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Sargun, do you have anything to contribute to this discussion from
your experience?
Are you using Ephemeral containers?

Thanks,
Amir.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux