On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:14 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Also test that d_ino of readdir entries and i_ino from /proc/locks are > consistent with st_ino and that inode numbers persist after rename to > new parent, drop caches and mount cycle. overlay/070 and overlay/071 fail for me like this: QA output created by 071 +flock: cannot open lock file /scratch/ovl-mnt/lowertestdir/blkdev: No such device or address ... I.e. there's no block dev with rdev=1/1. I don't see any other way to fix this, than to remove the device tests. Why are these needed? Is locking code in any way dependent on file type? Thanks, Miklos