On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 2:19 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:17 PM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:10 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > ===================================== > > > > WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! > > > > 5.6.0-rc3-syzkaller #0 Not tainted > > > > ------------------------------------- > > > > syz-executor194/8947 is trying to release lock (&ovl_i_lock_key[depth]) at: > > > > [<ffffffff828b7835>] ovl_inode_unlock fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h:328 [inline] > > > > [<ffffffff828b7835>] ovl_llseek+0x215/0x2c0 fs/overlayfs/file.c:193 > > > > but there are no more locks to release! > > > > > > > > > > This is strange. I don't see how that can happen nor how my change would > > > have caused this regression. If anything, the lock chance may have brought > > > a bug in stack file ops to light, but don't see the bug. > > > > The bug is that ovl_inode_lock() is interruptible and that the caller > > doesn't check for error. > > > > I think the fix is to make this lock uninterruptible (probably rename > > the current helper to _interruptible and use the current name as the > > uninterruptible version). > > > Miklos, Added the patch to ovl-fixes along with another ovl fix for fast track 5.6. #syz test: https://github.com/amir73il/linux.git ovl-fixes Thanks, Amir.
