On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 10:26 AM Eryu Guan <guaneryu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 06:17:22PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > From: "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > fsck.overlay should return correct exit code to show the file system
> > status after fsck, instead of return 0 means consistency and !0 means
> > inconsistency or something bad happened.
> >
> > Fix the following three exit code after running fsck.overlay:
> >
> > - Return FSCK_OK if the input file system is consistent,
> > - Return FSCK_NONDESTRUCT if the file system inconsistent errors
> > corrected,
> > - Return FSCK_UNCORRECTED if the file system still have inconsistent
> > errors.
> >
> > This patch also add a helper function to run fsck.overlay and check
> > the return value is expected or not.
> >
> > [amir] rename helper to _overlay_fsck_expect, split define of FSCK_*
> > to a seprate path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > common/overlay | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/overlay/045 | 27 +++++++++------------------
> > tests/overlay/046 | 36 ++++++++++++------------------------
> > tests/overlay/056 | 9 +++------
> > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/common/overlay b/common/overlay
> > index a71c2035..53e35caf 100644
> > --- a/common/overlay
> > +++ b/common/overlay
> > @@ -193,6 +193,25 @@ _overlay_fsck_dirs()
> > -o workdir=$workdir $*
> > }
> >
> > +# Run fsck and check for expected return value
> > +_overlay_fsck_expect()
> > +{
> > + # The first arguments is the expected fsck program exit code, the
> > + # remaining arguments are the input parameters of the fsck program.
> > + local expect_ret=$1
> > + local lowerdir=$2
> > + local upperdir=$3
> > + local workdir=$4
> > + shift 4
> > +
> > + _overlay_fsck_dirs $lowerdir $upperdir $workdir $* >> \
> > + $seqres.full 2>&1
> > + fsck_ret=$?
> > +
> > + [[ "$fsck_ret" == "$expect_ret" ]] || \
> > + echo "fsck return unexpected value:$expect_ret,$fsck_ret"
>
> This statement looks ambiguous, it's not that clear which return value
> is expected and which is unexpected. I'd like to change it to something
> like:
>
> "expect fsck.overlay to return $expect_ret, but got $fsck_ret"
>
> I can fix it on commit if you're OK with this change.
>
Fine by me.
Thanks,
Amir.
