On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:32 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi! > > There is no reason to continue the test if readahead syscall fails > > and we can also check and report TCONF if filesystem does not support > > readahead. > > This looks good, but I would like to get rid of the check_ret function > as I said in the first case. > > So maybe we can leave it in the cleanup but move the actuall code in > this patch. Does that sounds good to you? Will do. Thanks, Amir.
