Re: [PATCH 24/25] xfs: support returning partial reflink results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:05:36AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 10:35:46AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 05:08:32PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Back when the XFS reflink code only supported clone_file_range, we were
> > > only able to return zero or negative error codes to userspace.  However,
> > > now that copy_file_range (which returns bytes copied) can use XFS'
> > > clone_file_range, we have the opportunity to return partial results.
> > > For example, if userspace sends a 1GB clone request and we run out of
> > > space halfway through, we at least can tell userspace that we completed
> > > 512M of that request like a regular write.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c    |    5 +----
> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c |   20 +++++++++++++++-----
> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h |    2 +-
> > >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > index bc9e94bcb7a3..b2b15b8dc4a1 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > @@ -928,14 +928,11 @@ xfs_file_remap_range(
> > >  	loff_t		len,
> > >  	unsigned int	remap_flags)
> > >  {
> > > -	int		ret;
> > > -
> > >  	if (!remap_check_flags(remap_flags, RFR_SAME_DATA))
> > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > >  
> > > -	ret = xfs_reflink_remap_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out,
> > > +	return xfs_reflink_remap_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out,
> > >  			len, remap_flags);
> > 
> > Is there any reason not to merge xfs_file_remap_range and
> > xfs_reflink_remap_range at this point?
> 
> Yeah, that seems like a good idea to me - pulling all the
> vfs/generic code interactions back up into xfs_file.c would match
> how the rest of the file operations are layered w.r.t. external and
> internal XFS code...

Yeah, ditto ocfs2.  I'll look into throwing a few more refactors onto
the end of this series... 8-D

--D

> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux