On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 7:38 AM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > overlay/016 tests two cases of ro/rw fd data inconsistecies - > one using pread and one using mmap read (i.e. mread). > > The first case now passes with stacked overlay file operations > patch set merged. The second case will still fail. > > By splitting the two test cases we get one regression test for > the common case of ro/rw fd data inconsistecy with pread and > one test to track the remaining non-standard behavior of > overlayfs w.r.t mmap. > > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Eryu, > > The overlayfs ro/rw fd data inconsistecies patches were > finally merged, so we can now merge this test change to > reflect new behavior. > > After this change on current master: > - overlay/16 is expected to pass > - overlay/61 is expected to fail > > FYI, overlay/60 (new metacopy feature test) is also expected to > run and pass on master. > Eryu, More FYI from testing overlayfs over ext4/xfs on master: - With base fs xfs, swap group tests crash the kernel - sent out a fix - With base fs xfs, overlay/019 stress test hits lockdep "circular dependency" and "downgrading a read lock" warnings - it seems like a 4.18-rc1 regression I will need more time to investigate - With base fs ext4, the 6 tests that do "_test_generic_punch -d" fail - all expect for generic/009 are regressions from this cycle The above generic tests failures are the only failures I observed with "check -overlay -g quick" apart from test that also fail on base fs (e.g. generic/484). Thanks, Amir.
