On 2018/7/30 13:56, Amir Goldstein Wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 11:42 AM, zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> These are fsck.overlay program related patch set. The first patch correct >> the exit code of fsck.overlay in the existing 3 test cases, the second >> patch introduce a stress case to test stability, and the final patch add >> some exception cases to test exception handling process of fsck.overlay. >> >> The fsck.overlay program also was undate at: >> >> https://github.com/hisilicon/overlayfs-progs/tree/next >> >> All these three patches have been tested with the new fsck.overlay, >> please review. >> > > So if Eryu tests your changes without updating to new fsck.overlay, > tests will start to fail. Is that the expected behavior? > > Right now it may not be a big nuisance, but you should declare which > is "the official" version of fsck.overlay to test with xfstest - > is it next? master? > Probably best if you ask Eryu to hold back on merging changes not > compatible with current fsck.overlay master, until the master branch > is updated and would be useful to ANNOUNCE the overlayfs-progs > updates to the list with the gist of changes. > Hi Amir, Thanks for your suggestion. I will update these fsck.overlay changes to master branch and post an ANNOUNCE email. I originally wanted to wait for some comments, if any, before I update these changes to fsck.overlay's master branch. I will follow your suggested steps next time, and will post patch set before update to master branch if it deserve to review. Thanks, Yi. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
