On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:31 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 07:24:23PM +0100, Al Viro wrote: >> I hate it, but... consider path_open() objections withdrawn for now. Is that an ACK for the pull if I follow up with fixes for mmap botch, etc? >> Uses of ->vm_file (and rules for those) are too convoluted to untangle >> at the moment. I still would love to get that straightened out, but >> it's not this cycle fodder, more's the pity... Looked at some other options... What coda mmap does looks very dubious. It only sets f_mapping, not vm_file. That's going to get into all sorts of trouble when underlying fs tries to look at file_inode() or worse, ->private_data. Looks like that should be converted to what overlayfs does, to have a remote chance of actually not crashing on most filesystems. Does anybody actually use coda still? > PS: conversion of ->f_path.dentry is easy and that can probably go this > cycle - it's a fairly trivial change, with no functional changes unless > overlayfs is used with <filesystem>, fixing really bad shit if it ever > gets used thus. I'm not asking to put that into overlayfs pull *and* > it's independent from the "want to kill that fucking kludge" stuff. > The latter is too hard for this cycle, unfortunately. So this is about adding a file_dentry_check() (or whatever we want to call it) helper to be used by all filesystems when dereferecing f_path.dentry, right? Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
