On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> FYI, Miklos has a patch set in review to fix the last of the >>> non-standard behavior tracking test that is still failing (overlay/016). >>> After that patch set is merged, all overlay tests will be expected to >>> pass on master - new era ;-) >> >> Oh, we can write new tests that don't pass ;) Another one: fstat() returns incorrect st_ctime after unlink of a lower file/directory. Alternative fixes: 1) take some attributes from whiteout 2) metacopy up to tmpfile But first of all, we need a test case that fails, otherwise there's no motivation to do the fix ;) I'm wondering, would it make sense to manually add "rotation points" to plain xfstest test cases? Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
