On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Current test expects test_lower to fail with: > > truncate(test_lower) should have failed > > While it is sort of okay to fail like that (the above expectation basically > acknowledges this weirdness in the overlayfs implementation), it is by no > means the only correct behavior: it is also correct for the test to > succeed (i.e. truncation fails with ETXTBSY). > > So add an option to t_truncate_self.c that allows both success and failure, > but obviously not SIGSEGV, which is what a we'd get in a real failure mode. > > Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks good. Thanks, Amir. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
